Lion, witch, wardrobe and the Jesus allegory
Click image to enlarge
|
By: JOE ESKENAZI j. The Jewish news weekly of Northern California
A potential mega-blockbuster film, financed by a fervent Christian and bursting with Christian overtones, is being mass-marketed to n guess who? n Christians.
Church groups are buying up whole theater showings just like Daddy Warbucks did for Annie. Pastors and ministers have given the film their blessing, literally. Catholic publishing companies are putting out companion guides.
And the Jewish community is, … well, no one knows quite what to think.
That’s because the film in question isn’t Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ.” It’s “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe,” the special-effects adaptation of British author C.S. Lewis’s classic 1950 children’s book.
The $250 million film, which opened Dec. 9, was produced by the owner of The San Francisco Examiner, the right-wing evangelical billionaire Philip Anschutz, who also owns Walden Media. Walt Disney Co. also helped, especially on the distribution end. In fact, many of the same firms that so successfully recruited whole congregations to attend showings of “The Passion” have been contracted again for “Lion.”
“Should Jewish children see this movie or read the books? I’m unsure. My personal jury is still out,” said Rabbi Judah Dardik, spiritual leader of Beth Jacob Congregation in Oakland, Calif. “I read them; clearly, it didn’t affect my personal theology.”
Like Gibson, Anschutz is a figure who makes many wary. Anschutz also is an outspoken evangelical, who was attracted to the Narnia tales for the same reason others in the business were repelled n its Christian messages.
But “Lion” is no “Passion.” Compared with the extremely negative reaction “Passion” garnered from Jewish organizations before, during, and after its release, the marketing of Christian allegory as popular entertainment in “Lion” has created hardly a ripple.
The latent nature of “Lion’s” Christian message, and the fact that one can be completely oblivious yet still enjoy the story, allows the film’s producers to promote “Lion” on two levels: one method for avowedly Christian audiences and one for everyone else.
While the uplifting Christian message is pitched to pastors and church groups, the theatrical trailer features a dazzling array of special effects created by Peter Jackson’s workshop n the company the New Zealand-based director founded to tackle “Lord of the Rings” n and huge battle scenes.
Disney is allocating about 5% of its promotional budget to wooing Christian groups. Peter Sealey, the former president of marketing and distribution for Columbia Pictures, describes this as “a very effective use of that money (since) that audience does not have as many films as it wants.”
Sealey, however, saw “duplicity” in the way Disney is shying away from mentioning Lewis’s Christian message in its general publicity materials. In a 16-page “Narnia Educator Guide” that Sealey found on the film’s website, religion and Christianity aren’t mentioned even once.
“The issue is secular audiences. Will they appreciate seeing a religious message without knowing it?” he asked. Disney “should make a statement; they should let people know. The lion is resurrected. It’s a great piece of entertainment, and you can enjoy it if you’re Christian or not. However, the underpinnings of the work reflect the New Testament.”
Once it’s known that Lewis was a theologian who wrote with a Christian message in mind, the parallels between the Narnia tales and the New Testament easily fall into place.
For starters:
• Narnia, a magical kingdom created by the divine King Aslan, is currently in a state of perpetual winter due to a curse of the evil White Witch. The four children (two “Sons of Adam,” two “Daughters of Eve”) stumble in via the enchanted, eponymous wardrobe and become the disciples of Aslan.
The child Edmund betrays his siblings and Aslan, Judas-style, to aid the White Witch, and he is saved when Aslan allows himself to be sacrificed, not unlike Jesus.
• Aslan is resurrected, and the White Witch is vanquished. The four children are crowned kings and queens of Narnia. Peter n not a coincidental choice of names n becomes High King.
• In the last of the “Chronicles of Narnia,” fittingly titled “The Last Battle,” an army of people described in a manner recalling the medieval Turks and aligned with a donkey in a lion costume (a false god, if you will) invades Narnia.
Those who believe in Aslan pass through a gate into another realm. After a terrifying moment passing through the gate, a beautiful kingdom is revealed. Aslan decrees that he has ended Narnia just as he began it, and the four children, who died in the world of postwar Great Britain, can now live with him forever in paradise along with other believers.
You figure it out.
Pastor Earl Palmer, co-founder of Berkeley’s New College and a scholar on Lewis, said Lewis always saw his tales as “stories of the marvelous,” but Palmer admits that Aslan is a loosely veiled Christ figure. But Lewis wasn’t trying to fool anyone, Palmer says: Before turning to children’s books, he wrote Christian religious tracts.
Lewis denied he was writing allegorically. Instead, he claimed to simply be imagining the concepts of good, evil and the ultimate redeemer in a mystical world of his own creation.
But he never went so far as to claim the obvious Christian parallels were a coincidence.
“There’s one funny line he put in a letter. He said children know who Aslan is,” Palmer said. “The great golden lion, son of the emperor from beyond the sea, is a Christ reference.’’
And the golden lion is the sole redeemer..
Church groups are buying up whole theater showings just like Daddy Warbucks did for Annie. Pastors and ministers have given the film their blessing, literally. Catholic publishing companies are putting out companion guides.
And the Jewish community is, … well, no one knows quite what to think.
That’s because the film in question isn’t Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ.” It’s “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe,” the special-effects adaptation of British author C.S. Lewis’s classic 1950 children’s book.
The $250 million film, which opened Dec. 9, was produced by the owner of The San Francisco Examiner, the right-wing evangelical billionaire Philip Anschutz, who also owns Walden Media. Walt Disney Co. also helped, especially on the distribution end. In fact, many of the same firms that so successfully recruited whole congregations to attend showings of “The Passion” have been contracted again for “Lion.”
“Should Jewish children see this movie or read the books? I’m unsure. My personal jury is still out,” said Rabbi Judah Dardik, spiritual leader of Beth Jacob Congregation in Oakland, Calif. “I read them; clearly, it didn’t affect my personal theology.”
Like Gibson, Anschutz is a figure who makes many wary. Anschutz also is an outspoken evangelical, who was attracted to the Narnia tales for the same reason others in the business were repelled n its Christian messages.
But “Lion” is no “Passion.” Compared with the extremely negative reaction “Passion” garnered from Jewish organizations before, during, and after its release, the marketing of Christian allegory as popular entertainment in “Lion” has created hardly a ripple.
The latent nature of “Lion’s” Christian message, and the fact that one can be completely oblivious yet still enjoy the story, allows the film’s producers to promote “Lion” on two levels: one method for avowedly Christian audiences and one for everyone else.
While the uplifting Christian message is pitched to pastors and church groups, the theatrical trailer features a dazzling array of special effects created by Peter Jackson’s workshop n the company the New Zealand-based director founded to tackle “Lord of the Rings” n and huge battle scenes.
Disney is allocating about 5% of its promotional budget to wooing Christian groups. Peter Sealey, the former president of marketing and distribution for Columbia Pictures, describes this as “a very effective use of that money (since) that audience does not have as many films as it wants.”
Sealey, however, saw “duplicity” in the way Disney is shying away from mentioning Lewis’s Christian message in its general publicity materials. In a 16-page “Narnia Educator Guide” that Sealey found on the film’s website, religion and Christianity aren’t mentioned even once.
“The issue is secular audiences. Will they appreciate seeing a religious message without knowing it?” he asked. Disney “should make a statement; they should let people know. The lion is resurrected. It’s a great piece of entertainment, and you can enjoy it if you’re Christian or not. However, the underpinnings of the work reflect the New Testament.”
Once it’s known that Lewis was a theologian who wrote with a Christian message in mind, the parallels between the Narnia tales and the New Testament easily fall into place.
For starters:
• Narnia, a magical kingdom created by the divine King Aslan, is currently in a state of perpetual winter due to a curse of the evil White Witch. The four children (two “Sons of Adam,” two “Daughters of Eve”) stumble in via the enchanted, eponymous wardrobe and become the disciples of Aslan.
The child Edmund betrays his siblings and Aslan, Judas-style, to aid the White Witch, and he is saved when Aslan allows himself to be sacrificed, not unlike Jesus.
• Aslan is resurrected, and the White Witch is vanquished. The four children are crowned kings and queens of Narnia. Peter n not a coincidental choice of names n becomes High King.
• In the last of the “Chronicles of Narnia,” fittingly titled “The Last Battle,” an army of people described in a manner recalling the medieval Turks and aligned with a donkey in a lion costume (a false god, if you will) invades Narnia.
Those who believe in Aslan pass through a gate into another realm. After a terrifying moment passing through the gate, a beautiful kingdom is revealed. Aslan decrees that he has ended Narnia just as he began it, and the four children, who died in the world of postwar Great Britain, can now live with him forever in paradise along with other believers.
You figure it out.
Pastor Earl Palmer, co-founder of Berkeley’s New College and a scholar on Lewis, said Lewis always saw his tales as “stories of the marvelous,” but Palmer admits that Aslan is a loosely veiled Christ figure. But Lewis wasn’t trying to fool anyone, Palmer says: Before turning to children’s books, he wrote Christian religious tracts.
Lewis denied he was writing allegorically. Instead, he claimed to simply be imagining the concepts of good, evil and the ultimate redeemer in a mystical world of his own creation.
But he never went so far as to claim the obvious Christian parallels were a coincidence.
“There’s one funny line he put in a letter. He said children know who Aslan is,” Palmer said. “The great golden lion, son of the emperor from beyond the sea, is a Christ reference.’’
And the golden lion is the sole redeemer..
| The latest trend in Hollywood? ‘Jew Cool’ | Chanukah CD for adults |
Article Rating
Reader Comments
The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of clevelandjewishnews.com.
You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments. Registration is free.
Registered users sign in here: |
Become a Registered User |


